STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL
BOARD
SFY 2001 Costa-Machado Water
Act of 2000
Chapter 6, Article 2, Watershed Protection Program
|
APPLICANT: |
Salmon Creek Watershed
Council |
|
ADDRESS: |
Post Office Box 125 |
|
|
Bodega, CA 94922 |
|
|
|
|
PROJECT DIRECTOR: |
Kathleen Kraft |
|
E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
kkkraft@yahoo.com |
FAX NO.: |
(707) 876-1806 |
|
PHONE NO.: |
(707) 874-2014 |
FEDERAL TAX I.D. NO.: |
94-3175306 |
|
PROJECT TITLE: |
Salmon to Salmon Creek |
PROBLEM(S) BEING ADDRESSED:
Decline in suitable habitat
for aquatic life resulting in federal and state listings of endangered species,
reduced water quality and quantity, increased sedimentation in creek, loss of
riparian habitat.
|
WATERBODY/WATERSHED: |
Salmon Creek Watershed |
FISCAL SUMMARY:
|
Prop 13 Funds Requested |
$200,000 |
(minimum [$50,000]/maximum
[$5,000,000]) |
PROJECT SUMMARY:
The Category 1 Salmon Creek Watershed drains directly into the Pacific Ocean just north of Bodega Bay, a true coastal watershed. Once an excellent steelhead trout and coho salmon stream, the fishery has seriously declined. The last coho was observed in 1996. Land uses in the 34.5 square miles of watershed are a mix of rural residential and agriculture, primarily grazing with a small but expanding number of vineyards. In addition to an entirely wild population of steelhead, the watershed is home to a number of listed aquatic species including the California freshwater shrimp, western pond turtle, and red-legged frog. The watershed has no large dams or urban centers, and retains significant areas of vigorous native riparian habitat, especially below the town of Bodega. Salmon Creek ends in a magnificent estuary, which provides vital habitat for migrating waterfowl and shorebirds.
Many members of the community, from long-time ranchers and Bodega Bay fishermen to newcomers, have expressed their support of seeing the return of a strong salmonid run. The first Salmon Creek Watershed Day in 1998 attracted over 300 people; another is planned for the summer of 2001. The Salmon Creek Watershed Council with its partners, the Bodega Land Trust and Gold Ridge RCD, is committed to developing a watershed plan that protects the beauty and integrity of the watershed while supporting a healthy, sustainable local economy.
The three primary goals of the proposed project are to: 1) Develop an overview of the condition of the watershed through assessments of land use, sediment sources, instream habitat, riparian condition, and water quality, and create a Watershed Management Plan: 2) Increase public awareness and stewardship of the watershed’s natural resources: 3) Strengthen the young network of watershed councils working in western Sonoma County.
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
|
APPLICANT: |
Salmon
Creek Watershed Council |
|
PROJECT
TITLE: |
Salmon
to Salmon Creek |
|
|
Total Budget |
|
Matching Funds* |
|
Prop 13 SWRCB Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Personnel Services |
$133,440 |
|
$63,440 |
|
$70,000** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
$5,000*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Property Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.
Equipment |
$6,000 |
|
$1,000 |
|
$5,000 |
|
(Digital camera, laptop computer, software) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
b.
Furniture |
$250 |
|
$ 250 |
|
|
|
c.
Portable assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d.
Electronic data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
e.
Processing equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
f.
Miscellaneous
(monitoring supplies and equipment) |
|
|
|
|
$8,000 |
|
g.
Real Estate easements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
h. Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Professional and Consulting Services |
$111,500 |
|
$6,500 |
|
$92,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Construction Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. CEQA/NEPA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Overhead (10%) |
$20,000 |
|
|
|
$20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL BUDGET
|
$271,190 |
|
$71,190 |
|
$200,000 |
* Includes in-kind support
from local community in planning, outreach, office management, and creation and
maintenance of two websites.
** Includes Watershed Council
staff plus trained community field assistants.
*** Includes production of
outreach materials and final watershed plan.
Note: The SWRCB reserves the right to adjust
project awards. Applicants may be
asked to reduce their project budgets.
Applicants should be prepared to provide detailed justification of costs
by task for their project.
|
1. PROJECT TITLE: |
Salmon to Salmon Creek |
|
2. LEAD AGENCY: |
Bodega Land Trust a
501c3 California Not for Profit |
|
ADDRESS: |
Post Office Box 254 |
|
|
Bodega, California 94922 |
|
|
|
|
PROJECT DIRECTOR: |
Kathleen Kraft |
|
E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
kkkraft@yahoo.com |
FAX NO.: |
707-876-1806 |
|
PHONE NO. |
707-874-2104 |
3a. WATERSHED IN WHICH THE PROJECT WILL BE UNDERTAKEN: Salmon Creek Watershed
3b. COUNTY IN WHICH THE PROJECT WILL BE
UNDERTAKEN: Sonoma
3c. IS THE PROPOSED PROJECT WITHIN THE CALFED SOLUTION AREA? _____ yes X no
3d. Do you
want your project forwarded to CALFED to alert CALFED to your need for
funding? yes X no
4. IDENTIFY THE MAJOR SOURCES OF NPS POLLUTION THAT WILL
BE ADDRESSED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE SOURCES).
X Agriculture X
Forestry X Urban (Construction, Roads, Septic Systems) X
Stormwater/Urban Runoff
____Marinas and Boating
Activities X Hydromodification
____Resource Extraction Other: X Ranch and Rural Residential Roads
5. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
a. PROBLEM
STATEMENT
The problems facing the Salmon Creek Watershed include loss of salmonid habitat, as well as general habitat loss and degradation. The Region 1 Watershed Management Initiative states that in Salmon Creek, “[C]oncerns have been raised by the public regarding increased sedimentation, water temperature, nutrients and salmonid habitat values.” Problems are attributed to the detrimental effects of roads, grazing, vineyard conversions, confined animal wastes, domestic septic system failures, timber harvests, loss of riparian habitat, residential pressures, and reduced flows in tributaries and the mainstem. Salmon Creek is a Category 1 watershed and is considered degraded because of sediment. According to Michael Banks of the Bodega Marine Lab, the last coho was sighted in 1996. The return of salmon is a goal strongly supported by residents of the watershed.
The Salmon Creek Watershed Council is one of many proactive citizen, environmental, and industry groups committed to establishing a watershed plan to restore the watershed, water quality, and endangered species plus other aquatic and terrestrial life. Gold Ridge RCD, Fish and Game, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service have funded conservation measures and outreach activities. U.C. Cooperative Extension has helped agricultural producers formulate individual conservation plans to protect natural resources. A prioritized and organized restoration program developed by community members will provide a vision to direct continued conservation efforts over the next 20 years and beyond. Baseline data gathered in the assessment, coupled with monitoring, will allow progress to be gauged and adaptations incorporated.
People are drawn to this area by the health and beauty of the natural environment. Since the 1890s, annual July 4th celebrations have been held in an old growth redwood grove on the banks of Tannery Creek, a tributary of Salmon Creek. This community strength can be called upon to support efforts to bring back the once plentiful coho and steelhead. There are many residents who remember them with great emotion. Despite ongoing projects, riparian revegetation, outreach, and education programs, there is a great need to have a comprehensive watershed plan to look holistically at the health of the system.
b. SPECIFIC
WATER QUALITY GOALS INVOLVED
Goal 9 in the Watershed Management Initiative for the Russian River/Bodega area is the “Assessment of Salmon Creek and other tributaries.” Goal 3 is “Protect and enhance coldwater fisheries.” Steelhead trout and coho salmon are federally listed as threatened species, and Salmon Creek is identified as critical habitat. With the last official coho sighting in 1996, time is of the essence in identifying and implementing restoration measures.
This
project will focus on collecting basic streamflow data, water quality data (pH,
dissolved oxygen, turbidity, temperature, nutrients, conductivity and bacteria)
and assessing sediment delivery, instream habitat, and riparian habitat. The
collected data can be used to help assess the current conditions of Salmon
Creek’s aquatic habitat for anadromous fish and other aquatic species
(including the red-legged frog, western pond turtle, and endangered California
freshwater shrimp), domestic water, agricultural and recreational uses. The
Watershed Plan produced from the assessment and community goals will guide
implementation to achieve water quality sufficient to support a healthy aquatic
ecosystem. The Plan will also identify possible additional assessment and
outreach needs, such as a water budget, and provide the foundation for the
Salmon Creek Watershed Council to effectively seek more grant funds and continue
to galvanize strong community support.
c. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
Our project is to complete a management plan of the entire watershed as part of a regional watershed planning effort. This process will have three major components:
A) Develop an overview of the condition of the
watershed to formulate a Watershed Management Plan. Key partners include Gold Ridge RCD (GRRCD), local
landowners, DFG, NMFS, NRCS, Point Reyes Bird Observatory (PRBO), Harmony Union
School District, Bodega Marine Lab, and the West County Watershed Network. Prop. 13:79080j requirements addressed
in this component are listed below following each project element.
1. Sediment source inventory (including roads) with
predicted sediment delivery loads, prescribed treatments, and list of potential
projects (requirements 1, 2, 5, 7, 8 and 10).
2. Riparian habitat assessment and list of potential
projects (requirements 1, 2, 5, 7, 8 and 10).
3.
Land use inventory
summary and mapping (requirements 1, 2, 5, 7, and 8).
4.
In stream habitat typing
to be completed by DFG in 2001 (requirements 1, 2, 5, 7, 8 and 10).
5.
Landowner outreach and
watershed community meetings (requirements 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9).
6.
Community training for
erosion and riparian habitat assessments and for bird monitoring (requirements
1, 3, 4, 5, 8 and 9).
7.
Water quality monitoring
training for community members, related data collection and summary
(requirements 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10).
8.
Watershed Plan that
includes goals, potential projects, and assessment data (requirements 1 through
10).
9.
Watershed maps showing
information collected in assessments. Mapping will be done using
AutoCAD™, and will be readily transferable to a GIS.
10.
Periodic reporting to
SWRCB/RWQCB.
B) Increase public awareness.
The
assessment process provides an opportunity to involve the public and increase
awareness of the importance of water quality by demonstrating how their lives
collectively and directly influence the watershed. This will be done through a series of workshops and meetings
targeting different segments of the community. There will also be opportunities for residents to receive
training in assessment and monitoring procedures. This strategy will have a three-fold effect: public
recognition of problems in the watershed; a local ecological knowledge base;
and development of a community sense of responsibility. Ultimately, increased public awareness
will result in improved habitat as well as local economic development that
sustains the natural environment.
This component addresses Prop. 13: 7908j requirements 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8 and 9.
C) Strengthen the network of watershed councils within the Gold Ridge RCD and contribute to regional watershed planning.
This effort includes: (1)
participation in regular West County Watershed Network meetings as part of an
ongoing effort to coordinate watershed activities with other watershed groups
and to share knowledge, resources, and research efforts; (2) participation in
“Basins of Relations,” an annual, week-long workshop designed to
disseminate information on all aspects of the watershed and develop the organizational
capacities of watershed groups in the Gold Ridge RCD; and (3) representation of
watershed concerns at “Blue Circle” meetings with agency
representatives. This component
addresses Prop. 13: 7908j requirements 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.
d. WORK TO BE PERFORMED/PROPOSED ACTIONS
i. ITEMIZED TASKS AND MILESTONES
|
Task |
Completion Date |
Methods and Milestones |
|
1. Assessment. |
|
|
|
1.1 Compile existing information |
June, 2002 |
|
|
1.2
Prepare land use history |
March, 2002 |
·
Interview current and
past residents. ·
Research historic
photos, reports, and other archives. |
|
1.3 Complete sediment survey |
March, 2003 |
·
Review existing past
and current aerial photographs. ·
Interview residents. ·
Conduct a field
inventory to check the most significant sites and determine sediment delivery
rates. The inventory will include a photograph of each site, a sketch with
rough measurements, landowner name, an activity rating (i.e., low, medium,
high), possible repairs, and a priority rating. Unsurfaced roads will be
surveyed using the PWA methodolgy. ·
Train community
assistants. ·
Indicate prioritized
erosion sites on a digititized watershed map. ·
Compile the inventory
information into a written report. ·
Present the erosion
information at a community meeting. |
|
1.4 Complete riparian habitat survey |
March, 2003 |
·
Analyze existing
information, including aerial photographs and landowner interviews, and
perform field reconnaissance to characterize historic and present riparian
plant communities. Characterization will include density, species
composition, and stand condition. ·
Train community
assistants. ·
Develop a list of
priority sites and restoration recommendations. ·
Summarize information
into a written report with a discussion on the potential to enhance and
protect the existing plant communities. ·
Produce a digitized
map showing known historic and existing riparian habitat. ·
Present the riparian
habitat information at a community meeting. |
|
1.5 Complete in stream habitat inventory |
December, 2001 |
To be completed by DFG in 2001. This inventory includes embeddedness and substrate composition; presence of woody debris, undercut banks and other cover; pool riffle ratios; flow; water temperatures; canopy density; bank composition; and channel typing according to Rosgen (1996). |
|
1.6 Develop a citizen-based monitoring
program for water quality and flow |
Year 1 October, 2002 Year 2 October, 2003 Year 3 October, 2004 |
YEAR 1
·
Determine monitoring
sites (including stream reference reach and water quality monitoring
station). ·
Develop monitoring
plan based on current SWRCB protocols. ·
Establish monitoring
sites (survey reference reach, set staff plate and crest gauge). ·
Identify community
volunteers/ staff. ·
Purchase monitoring
equipment. YEAR 2 ·
Water monitoring
training for community volunteers/ staff. ·
Begin community
monitoring program w/ professional supervision. ·
Seek funding to
complete 10 years of stream monitoring. YEAR 3
·
Community
volunteers/staff monitoring. ·
Professional staff
provide on going monitoring assistance. ·
Summarize data and
include in watershed plan. |
|
1.7 Develop a citizen-based bird monitoring program |
Training completed by July,
2002 Monitoring ongoing |
·
Select best indicators
for Salmon Creek riparian health based on Riparian Bird Conservation Plan. ·
Determine monitoring
sites with PRBO. ·
PRBO training of
community volunteers. ·
Monitor each spring
with area searches, point counts, territory mapping, nest monitoring to
establish reproductive success, diversity and abundance. |
|
2. Landowner/Resident Outreach and Community
Education. |
|
|
|
2.1 Salmon Creek Watershed Day |
May 19, 2001, and then
regularly thereafter |
·
Day-long celebration
in the process of being organized by the Salmon Creek Watershed Council.
Includes lectures, exhibits, and children’s school projects. |
|
2.2 Mailings and newsletters |
Ongoing |
·
Coordinate with RCD,
Sonoma Land Trust, Joy Road Neighborhood Association, Bodega Land Trust.
Notify as per Section 79080 (h). ·
Use to solicit
involvement in the Management Plan, provide information on assessment and
results, invite residents to meetings and events. |
|
2.3 One-on-one outreach |
Ongoing |
·
Coordinate with Gold
Ridge RCD, NRCS. |
|
2.4 Public Meetings |
Ongoing |
·
Cooperate with Gold
Ridge RCD and other watershed groups. ·
Hold small, targeted
meetings designed for maximum participation with emphasis on information. |
|
2.5 Public review of
completed assessments |
April, 2004 |
·
Series of meetings
with targeted groups (i.e., ranchers, vineyard owners, rural residents,
townspeople). These meetings will review results of various assessments with
landowners and residents. |
|
2.6 Community meetings to develop a
watershed management plan |
August, 2004 |
·
Facilitate a series of
at least three public meetings based on consensus process to develop overall
management strategy inclusive of all stakeholder interests. |
|
3. Strengthen network of watershed councils. |
|
|
|
3.1 “Basins of
Relations” course |
Yearly
in the summer |
Sponsored
by DFG and Occidental Arts and Ecology Center. A comprehensive course put on
by Brock Dolman for watershed groups that gives a thorough grounding in
watershed management and helps watershed group development |
|
3.2 Regular Watershed Network meetings |
Ongoing |
Regular meetings to share information, work on common problems, share success stories, and coordinate regional watershed efforts. |
|
3.3 Coordination with Gold
Ridge RCD |
Ongoing |
Formation of steering
committee with participation of watershed groups, RCD, NRCS, and DFG.
Attendance at monthly RCD meetings by representatives of the watershed group. |
|
4. Reporting & Mgt Plan Preparation |
|
|
|
4.1 Quarterly reports |
Quarterly |
|
|
4.2 Final Report |
October, 2004 |
|
|
4.3 Watershed Management Plan |
October, 2004 |
·
Compile existing
information, collected assessment and monitoring data, prioritized
restoration recommendations, and community goals into a draft management
plan. ·
Review draft at
community meetings. Make draft available to all stakeholders. ·
Complete final
Watershed Management Plan. |
ii. METHODS AND MATERIALS TO BE USED IN PERFORMING THE WORK
Methods
are described above in Question 5(d)(i). Materials include a digital camera,
laptop computer, water monitoring supplies, and postage and printing for
outreach materials. Flow will be measured with a staf plate and crest guage.
iii. REGULATIONS
AND STANDARDS TO ASSURE A MINIMUM STANDARD OF QUALITY, REGULATORY COMPLIANCE,
AND PRODUCT ACCEPTABILITY. THIS
INCLUDES CEQA/NEPA, AS NOTED ON PAGE I-6
OF THIS RFP.
Not applicable since this is an assessment and plan.
e. STARTING
AND ENDING DATES FOR THE ACTIVITIES PROPOSED FOR FUNDING UNDER THIS GRANT
Project
Start date: November 2, 2001 End
date: November 1, 2004
(after November 1, 2001) (no later than November 1, 2004)
Is
this a phased project or part of a larger project effort? Y X N __
The
Watershed Management Plan is the beginning of a long-term outreach and implementation
effort.
f. MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN
If the project is selected, funded projects
must submit to the SWRCB a monitoring and reporting plan consistent with the
provisions of this RFP and requirements of the subaccount. If water quality sampling (chemistry)
or other environmental measurements are undertaken, the applicant will be
required to prepare and maintain a Quality Assurance Plan (QAP). The QAP shall be approved by the RWQCB
Quality Assurance Officer, Peter Otis (707) 576-2662, or the SWRCB Quality
Assurance Officer, Bill Ray (916/341-5583), or the Contract Manager prior
to the implementation of any sampling or monitoring activities. Describe any monitoring or reporting
that will be necessary to satisfy this requirement
Water quality will be monitored according to
a prepared QAP that has been approved by the SWRCB quality assurance officer.
i.
Does
your project include any type of monitoring activity? If so, will at least a
portion of that monitoring be considered Citizen Monitoring? For purposes of this RFP, Citizen
Monitoring is defined as any monitoring activity that relies in whole or in
part on participation by volunteers, students, or non-paid staff.
Yes. We will use volunteers and paid staff for
monitoring.
ii. What type of monitoring is proposed? For example, types of monitoring activities could include photo-documentation, water quality monitoring, benthic macroinvertebrate bioassessment, or fluvial geomorphological measurements. Will your monitoring be oriented toward ambient water or habitat quality, or will it be used to determine the effectiveness of restoration or management measures?
A
long-term community stream monitoring program will be developed and implemented
over a three-year period. The program will focus on collecting basic water
quality, channel geometry, and flow data. The collected data can be used to
help assess the current conditions of Salmon Creek for fisheries, aquatic
habitat, domestic water, and recreational use. The information will also help evaluate land use changes and
development in the watershed and how it affects Salmon Creek and its
tributaries.
At
least six monitoring sites will be established throughout the watershed in
locations that represent various channel types, drainage areas and land uses; including
the main stem and selected tributaries. Monitoring sites will include a
reference reach study area, 20-30 channel widths long, that will be used to
evaluate channel geometries and features such as dimension (cross section),
profile and pattern (plan form). A staff plate and crest gauge will be
installed and used in conjunction with velocity measurements to monitor storm
flows, summer low flow regime, and annual peak flow. A water quality monitoring
station will be established within each reference reach study area where data
on temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, fecal coliform, pH, nutrients,
and turbidity will be collected.
In
Year 1, professional consultants will complete a one-time set up of all the
monitoring sites and provide training to community volunteers and Salmon Creek
Watershed Group staff on the various water quality monitoring and channel
survey techniques. Professional staff will oversee the data collection and work
with the community volunteers on the Year 2 monitoring. Community volunteers
will collect data with support from professional staff as requested from Year 3
on.
Channel
geometries and features will be surveyed annually. Water quality and flow
measurement collection will be either bi-weekly, monthly or bi-monthly. Flow
and water quality protocols will refer to the Sotoyome RCD manual
“Creating a Watershed Atlas and Monitoring Program” or other EPA
and SWRCB-approved volunteer monitoring protocols. Channel geometry and
features monitoring will refer to Dave Rosgen Applied River Morphology and to Dunne and Leopold’s Water in
Environmental Planning.
Point
Reyes Bird Observatory will also be training volunteers to monitor riparian
areas each spring with area searches, point counts, territory mapping and nest
monitoring.
6. SWRCB or RWQCB STAFF CONTACTED REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL:
|
RWQCB Contact: |
Janet Blake |
SWRCB
Contact: |
Bill Ray |
|
Phone No.: |
707-576-2805 |
Phone
No.: |
916-341-5583 |
|
Dates contacted: |
5/00,6/00/9/00,12/00,1/01 |
Dates
contacted: |
1/05/01 |
7. COOPERATING AGENCIES:
(Note
any formal agreements to cooperate.)
|
Agency Name |
Bodega Land Trust |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution to
Project: |
Fiscal Sponsor, easement
education and information |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Ann Cassidy |
Phone No.: |
707- 876-1806 |
|
E-mail address: |
alistair@sonic.net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency Name: |
Prunuske Chatham Inc. |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution to
Project: |
Contractor; sediment, water
quality, flow, and habitat surveys; community training |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Liza Prunuske |
Phone No.: |
707-874-0100 |
|
E-mail address: |
liza@pcz.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency Name: |
Gold Ridge RCD |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution to
Project: |
Landowner outreach;
database |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Joe Pozzi |
Phone No.: |
707-823-3037 |
|
E-mail address: |
JoePozzi@sonic.net |
|
|
|
Agency Name: |
California Department of Fish and Game |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution to
Project: |
Instream Habitat Survey |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Doug Albin |
Phone No.: |
707- 964-7683 |
|
E-mail address: |
dalbin@dfg2.ca.gov |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution to
Project: |
Fishery technical
information |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Bill Cox |
Phone No.: |
707-823-1001 |
|
E-mail address: |
billcox@dfg2.ca.gov |
|
|
|
Agency Name: |
USDA-NRCS |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution to
Project: |
Soil info, Maps,
Conservation practices, technical assistance |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Charlette Sanders |
Phone No.: |
707-794-1242 x3 |
|
E-mail address: |
charlette.sanders@ca.usda.gov |
|
|
|
Agency Name: |
Point Reyes Bird Observatory |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution to
Project: |
Bird Survey for Riparian
Health |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Geoff Geupel |
Phone No.: |
415-868-0655 |
|
E-mail address: |
ggeupel@prbo.org |
|
|
|
Agency Name: |
Sonoma Land
Trust |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution
to Project: |
Land use
summary, maps |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
David Katz |
Phone No.: |
707-526-6930 |
|
E-mail address: |
slt@sonic.net |
|
|
|
Agency Name: |
Surfrider
Foundation |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution
to Project: |
Fecal coliform
data and collection |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Mike Jensen |
Phone No.: |
707- 876-1859 |
|
E-mail address: |
mike@pcz.com |
|
|
|
Agency Name: |
Sonoma County Water Agency |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution
to Project: |
Flood control
information |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Renee Theriault
Webber |
Phone No. |
707-547-1936 |
|
E-mail address: |
renee@scwa.ca.gov |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency Name: |
Bodega
Marine Lab |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution
to Project: |
Fisheries
information |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Paul Siri |
Phone No.: |
707-875-2005 |
|
E-mail address: |
|
|
|
|
Agency Name: |
Sonoma
County Open Space District |
|
|
|
Role/Contribution to
Project: |
Land Use, Easements
Information |
|
|
|
Contact Person: |
Andrea McKenzie |
Phone No.: |
707-524-7360 |
|
E-mail address: |
|
|
|
8. ATTACH A MAP (8 ½ X 11 is preferred) DEPICTING
THE PROJECT AREA.
9. IS THE PROPOSED PROJECT PART OF AN EXISTING WATERSHED
RESTORATION ACTION STRATEGY OR EQUIVALENT DOCUMENT?
Yes___ No__X_
10. DOES THE PROPOSED PROJECT ADDRESS ANY OF THE WATERBODIES LISTED AS CATEGORY 1 (IMPAIRED) WATERSHEDS IN SECTION _ IN THE ARD?
Yes_X__ No___
Salmon
Creek Watershed Bodega Bay #
18010111
11. WILL THE PROPOSED PROJECT ACHIEVE MEASURABLE WATER
QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS?
Yes___ No_X__
Although this will be an assessment and plan with no actual implementation, future projects will be identified that will achieve measurable water quality improvements. Landowner awareness will also help water quality.
12. LIST ANY PREVIOUS PROP 13 IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS
AWARDED FOR WORK IN THIS WATERSHED.
None.
13. LIST GRANTS FROM OTHER AGENCIES AND OTHER FUNDING
SOURCES (SUCH AS CALFED, 319[h], 205[j], PROPOSITION 204) THAT HAVE BEEN USED
OR ARE CURRENTLY BEING USED TO SUPPORT WORK IN THIS WATERSHED.
A. 1987 Circuit Rider Productions, funded by a grant from
the Coastal Conservancy, produced the Sonoma County Coastal Wetlands
Enhancement Plan (Prop. 70
monies).
B. 1990-1993 A grant from the Coastal Conservancy to Gold
Ridge RCD implemented some of the proposals identified by the above plan. The work on ranches included gully
repairs, road repairs, bank repairs, sediment and grade control structures, and
a lined waterway.
C. Gold Ridge RCD currently has a grant from Sonoma
County Fish and Wildlife Advisory Board to install 9,000 feet of riparian
fencing in Fay Creek and a DFG grant for watershed outreach and enhancement.
They also have 205(j) and 319(h) grants pending for work in Salmon Creek and
neighboring watersheds.
D. The Bodega Land Trust and the landowners at 710 Salmon
Creek Road in Bodega received three grants for riparian restoration (1995 The
Northwest Emergency Assistance Program, 1996 California Department of Fish and
Game, 1995 The Rex Foundation). The restoration techniques used were
biotechnical bank repair, in stream habitat enhancement, and tree and shrub
planting.
E. 1998 NRCS (WHIP) and Partners for Wildlife funded a
riparian forest restoration on Fay Creek. Native grasses, shrubs, and trees
were planted, along with biotechnical stream bank stabilization.
F. 1974 Joy Road Study. This land use study was conducted by the Sonoma County
Planning Department.
G. The Sonoma County Fish and Wildlife Advisory Board has
paid for livestock exclusionary fencing.
H. STRAW (Students and Teachers Restoring a Watershed )
sponsored two classes from the Harmony United School District to plant native
riparian vegetation at two watershed sites.
I. The NRCS under their EQIP program funded 5 recent
watershed and stream bank protection projects in the watershed. They did
similar work years ago under the Agricultural Conservation Program.
J. The Chanslor Ranch completed a wetland restoration
project near the mouth of Salmon Creek.
14. SUMMARIZE ACTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED TO DATE
TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM(S) (e.g., PAST MONITORING, PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION
PHASES).
Answers to Question 13 above list specific implementation projects.
According
to the Watershed Management Initiative, “Little is known about the water
quality condition of Salmon Creek and it has received little attention from a
water sampling perspective.” According to Bill Cox, DFG fisheries
biologist, “There have been no studies in Salmon Creek and only a few
brief surveys to look at general conditions and fish presence.” The Salmon Creek Watershed Council put
on the 1998 Salmon Creek Watershed Day. Many of the speakers addressed the
watershed's problems. The Council
built and maintains two websites that contain detailed information about the
watershed (bodeganet.com/salmoncreek and freestone.com/salmoncreek).
The U.C. Cooperative Extension Service has conducted ranch planning courses.
The Bodega Land Trust holds educational talks and walks and publishes a regular
newsletter on watershed and land management issues.
15. DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT WILL RESULT IN ONGOING OR
WIDESPREAD IMPLEMENTATION THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT AREA, REGION, OR STATE.
The groups that have joined the West County Watershed Network are in various stages of formation. Any work we do will help those who are just beginning. Having a watershed plan with a list of prioritized projects is a huge step toward actual implementation and also an example for others that are in the planning stage. This project also serves as a model for thoughtful, well-organized grassroots watershed planning based on generous collaboration and cooperation.
16. DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT WILL DEMONSTRATE A CAPABILITY
OF SUSTAINING WATER QUALITY BENEFITS FOR A PERIOD OF 20 YEARS AS REQUIRED
BY PROP 13 (79080(d)(2)).
The Watershed Management Plan will provide a blueprint to focus and direct restoration, build community awareness, and continue water quality monitoring for the next 20 years.
17. IF THERE IS AN NPDES PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AREA (CHECK WITH YOUR RWQCB), DESCRIBE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROJECT TO THE
PERMIT. No
18. FOR PROP 13 PROJECTS, IDENTIFY THE NPS MANAGEMENT
MEASURE(S) THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL IMPLEMENT AND DESCRIBE HOW YOU WILL
BE ABLE TO TRACK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE MEASURES.
NRCS conservation practices will be incorporated into the watershed plan as well as NPS Management Measures. As this is only the planning phase, there will be no implementation.
19. WHAT CAPABILITY OR COMMITMENTS DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE
TO ENSURE THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED?
Organized
in 1997, the Salmon Creek Watershed Council has sponsored one Salmon Creek
Watershed Day in 1998, a community event attended by over 300 people, and is
currently planning the next in 2001.
Monthly meetings are open to the public. We have a donated office,
computer, website, copier, and willing volunteers.
The Bodega Land Trust, incorporated in 1993, is well respected in the community and holds 4 riparian corridor conservation easements in the watershed as well as 2 forever wild easements. Both organizations are committed to the entire watershed and its communities.
The community of people in the Salmon Creek watershed is deeply concerned about the landscape in which they live. Long time residents and newcomers alike would truly celebrate the return of the salmon. A number of conservation and forever wild easements already exist, and other parts of the watershed have been targeted for wildland protection by the Sonoma Land Trust and the Sonoma County Agricultural and Open Space District. Furthermore, Salmon Creek has been identified by the California Department of Fish and Game, National Marine Fisheries, Bodega Marine Laboratory, and fishermen’s organizations as a prime candidate for habitat restoration that will sustain wild salmon runs.
20. DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED FUTURE WORK
In the future, the Salmon Creek Watershed Council
will continue outreach and education to stakeholders in the watershed in
cooperation with Gold Ridge RCD, the schools, the Joy Ridge Neighborhood
Association, Bodega Land Trust, and the Rancho Bodega Historical Society. We will use public meetings,
newsletters, the web site, and the Salmon Creek Watershed Days to increase
citizen awareness. In addition,
the West County Watershed Network that grew out of last year’s
“Basins of Relations” course will continue regular meetings to pool
knowledge, resources, contacts, and ideas. There are also plans to form a local “Blue
Circle” to streamline and maximize contacts
with the various agencies. Salmon Creek Watershed Council will also work
closely with Gold Ridge RCD and landowners to vigorously support implementation
of the Watershed Management Plan restoration projects.
21. INDICATE IF THIS PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTING A TMDL.
Yes ___ No _X__ If yes, briefly explain.
Implementation of the watershed plan will reduce the need for watershed TMDLs.